On April 20, 2011, the Ohio Manufactured Homes Commission (OMHC) held  a hearing on proposed changes to Ohio Rule 4781, which governs  installation of manufactured homes in Ohio.  One change to those rules  was to allow ABS pads as footings for  manufactured homes.  The exact  wording is as follows:
"ABS footing pads shall be permitted if  used in accordance with the manufacturer installation instructions  and/or specification sheet of the specific ABS pad being used.  The use  of ABS pads must be used in conjunction with solid perimeter skirting in  accordance with paragraphs (D) (1) to (D) (4) and (E)(1) to (E)(6) of  rule 4781-6-02.5 of the Administrative Code."
We attended  this hearing specifically to voice concerns about this revision to the  previous rules that did not allow these pads.  Three ABS pad  manufacturers, Oliver, Polyvulc, and Tie-Down Engineering, also spoke at  the hearing in favor of the changed rules.  Our assessment of the  attitude of the OMHC during the hearing was that it favored the rule  change.  Therefore, we wrote the letter attached to this blog post and  submitted it to the OMHC within the comment period (less than 24  hours).  That letter is included here:
OMHC Has Approved ABS Pads For Manufactured Homes
We found later that the OMHC had indeed passed the rule change, allowing ABS pads.
As  the letter states, we are concerned that ABS pads will be used in  conditions where they are not intended.  Although the rule change states  that the installer must follow the manufacturer's installation  instructions, we had reviewed the instructions of the three main pad  manufacturers and found them greatly lacking in detail, and where there  is a lack of detail, there is opportunity for misuse.  In a conversation  with two of the manufacturer's representatives after the hearing, we  were informed that other states that have allowed ABS pads also have  training sessions particularly for ABS pads.  Our feeling is that if ABS  pads are allowed, they need to have such required training additional  to following the manufacturer's instructions.
Essentially, our  concern is that ABS pads require that soil be used as a replacement for  concrete footings or slab.  Granted, some soils can be "hard as  concrete" when at certain moisture content and without organic matter  and voids.  That is to say, the soil has the same bearing capacity as  concrete.  However, unlike concrete, which has a bearing capacity that  changes little over a wide range of conditions, the bearing capacity of  soil can change dramatically.
Therefore, if soil is going to be  used to replace concrete, the soil conditions must be controlled.  In  the one decently documented case where ABS pads were successfully used,  soil moisture and frost heave were well-controlled.  In this case,  insulated skirting to maintain temperatures above freezing in the  crawlspace and drainage around the home's perimeter were used.  The  manufacturers' installation instructions usually state a minimum  required  soil bearing capacity and that the pads be placed "at or below  the frost-line".  The insulated skirting, moves the frost line to  grade.  The required soil bearing capacity is in part essentially a  requirement for proper drainage because the soil bearing capacity can  drop significantly as the soil moisture increases.  Thus, soil moisture  needs to be controlled through proper drainage.
But, can  installers be trusted to measure soil bearing capacity accurately or to  accurately calculate whether an ABS pad be able to take the weight put  on it?  Can most inspectors be trusted to check the right parameters and  review the required information.  The OMHC has left those questions  wide open.  Currently, installers and inspectors are not required to  have special training.  Therefore, no two installers will be doing the  same installation or checking the same parameters.  That is why we wrote  the letter to the OMHC.  If ABS pads are going to be used, they need to  be used properly and uniformly.  They cannot simply be used in place of  concrete footings because soil is not exactly the same as concrete and  the weight being put on the soil will usually be more for ABS pads than  for concrete footings.
We are going to continue pursuing the  issues of proper training for ABS pad use.  We are also aiming for the  requirement that a licensed engineer approve the use of ABS pads to  assure that homeowners get the home that they believe they are buying.   In a future blog, we plan on commenting research sponsored by the Ohio  Manufactured Home Association which has been used to back the approval  of the pads.  Stay tuned.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment